Tropical Pacific SST Forecasts
Utilizing Multiple Coupled GCMs
contributed by David G. DeWitt1,
Edwin K. Schneider2,3 and Zeng-Zhen Hu3
1International
Research Institute for Climate Prediction,
2George Mason
University
3Center for
Ocean-Land-Atmosphere Studies
We
describe forecasts for tropical Pacific sea surface temperature (SST) made by
combining the forecasts produced by multiple independent coupled
atmosphere-ocean general circulation models (CGCMs). This initial forecast framework uses two
CGCMs. The two CGCMs utilize the
same ocean component model and are initialized using the same ocean data
assimilation product. This work is an extension of the combined CGCM forecasts
described in Schneider et al. (2003).
Differences between that work and the current forecasts include use of
an extended period for developing prior statistics, use of fewer models, and
employment of a different technique for combining the SST forecasts from the
different models. This manuscript gives the real time forecast starting from
April1, 2005. In a previous version of the ELLFB, retrospective forecast skill
for April 1 IC forecasts has been documented.
The
model descriptions have been given in previous versions of the Extended
Long-Lead Forecast Bulletin (ELLFB) and are skipped here for brevity. The atmospheric GCM (AGCM) component
models used are the ECHAM4.5 AGCM of
the Max Planck Institute for Meteorologie (Roeckner et al., 1996) and the
Center for Ocean-Land-Atmosphere (COLA) studies AGCM version 2 (Schneider,
2002). The ocean GCM (OGCM)
component model is version 3 of the Geophysical Fluid Dynamics Laboratory (GFDL)
modular ocean model (MOM) (Pacanowski and Griffes, 1998). The ocean initial
conditions are taken from an ocean data assimilation system produced at GFDL
using a variational optimal interpolation (Derber and Rosati, 1989).
Retrospective
forecasts using 7 ensemble members for the period January 1982 to present have
been made using the coupled system with ECHAM AGCM component.
Similar retrospective
forecasts using 5 ensemble members have been made using the coupled system with
COLA AGCM component. The variance
of SST anomalies differs between the two models and is also not the same as
found in nature. The retrospective
forecasts from both of the coupled systems have been normalized by the observed
variance. At each point a bootstrap
cross validation procedure is applied to bring the forecast variance closer to
observed. In this calculation, the forecast for a particular year is not used
to compute the mean or the standard deviation for either the model or the observations. The forecast anomaly for that year is
taken as the difference from the model climatology made without using that year
multiplied by the ratio of observed to model standard deviation also calculated
without the data from the year of the forecast. The final SST forecast is the simple arithmetic mean of the
normalized forecasts from the two coupled models.
The
current forecast for the Nino indices averaged SST anomalies made from April1,
2005 is shown in Figure 1. The combined coupled forecast calls for
both Nino regions to have continued warm conditions with approximately constant
anomaly magnitude throughout the forecast period. Peak amplitude of the warm anomalies is about 0.5°C
for both regions.
These
forecasts were made possible due to help from several institutions. Matt Harrison and Tony Rosati of GFDL
developed the ODA system and ran the 1980 to 1999 period. Ben Kirtman and
Duhong Min of COLA have ported the ODA to their system and run the 2000 to
present period. Bohua Huang of COLA
implemented the lower resolution of the OGCM used here. Max Planck has kindly provided the
ECHAM4.5 AGCM to the IRI. David
DeWitt was supported by a grant from the National Oceanic an Atmospheric Administration:
(NA07-GP0213). Support for Schneider and Hu was provided by the National
Science Foundation (ATM 98-14295,ATM01-22859), the National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration (NA 96-GP0056), and the National Aeronautics and
Space Administration (NAG 5-8202).
References:
Balmaseda, M. A., M. K. Davey, and D. L. T. Anderson,
1995: Decadal and seasonal
dependence of ENSO prediction skill.
J. Climate, 8, 2705-2715.
Derber, J. and A. Rosati, 1989:
A global oceanic data assimilation system. J. Phys. Oceanogr., 19, 1333-1347.
Pacanowski, R. C., and S. M. Griffes, 1998: MOM 3.0 Manual, NOAA/Geophysical Fluid
Dynamics Laboratory,
Roeckner, E., and Coauthors, 1996: The atmospheric general circulation
model ECHAM4: Model description and
simulation of present day climate.
Max-Planck-Institut fur Meteorologie, Rep. 218, 90pp. [Available from
MPI fur Meteorlogie, Bundesstr. 55, 20146
Schneider, E. K., 2002: Understanding the differences between
the equatorial Pacific as simulated by two coupled GCMs. J. Climate, 15, 449-469.
Schneider, E. K., D. G. DeWitt, A. Rosati, B. P.
Kirtman, L. Ji, and J. J. Tribbia, 2003:
Retrospective ENSO Forecasts:
Sensitivity to atmospheric model and ocean resolution. Mon. Wea. Rev., 131, 3038-3060.
Figure Captions:
Figure 1.
Combined coupled model forecast for the Nino3 and Nino3.4 regions from April1,
2005 initial conditions.